2008 Signal Integrity Seminars

taught by Dr. Howard Johnson

High- Speed Digital Design  

Oxford Univ. 
NEW!!   Rochester, NY 
San Jose, CA 

  June 23 - 24
  September 29 - 30   NEW!!
  October 27 - 28
Advanced High-Speed Signal Propagation  

Oxford Univ. 
San Jose, CA 

  June 25 - 26
  October 29 - 30
High-Speed Noise and Grounding

San Jose, CA 

  November 3 - 4
 

 

Voltage-Regulator Droop

(Originally published in EDN Magazine, September 14, 2006)
 

The circuit model in Figure 1 captures the important low-frequency behavior of most voltage regulators (Voltage-Regulator Model, EDN 8/17/2006). Parameters C2, R2, and L2 represent a typical bulk decoupling-capacitor array. To model the response below 100 kHz, you can set L2 to 0. Parameter R1 models the regulation resistance, or stiffness, of a small switching-regulator module. Parameter L1 models the response time.

Now try something outrageous. Add series resistance to the regulator output, effectively increasing the value of R1.

When the load draws current, the new, larger value of R1 increases the droop measured at VCC. That scenario sounds bad, but in some special circumstances, it is actually good for your circuit.

Figure 2shows the regulator-voltage response for values of R1 from 3 to 12 mΩ. The circuit is subject to an 8A step load with a maximum dI/dt of 2.5A/µsec. The plot shows the load current at the bottom and the collection of response curves at the top. It offsets each curve horizontally to visually separate them.

Concentrate on the red waveform (minimum value of R1). Beginning from rest at Point A, the VCC output sits at its nominal, midlevel value. When the load turns on, VCC responds with a downward glitch.

Only components C2 and R2 limit the initial amplitude of this glitch, because the regulator can't respond instantaneously; it takes a few switching cycles to respond.

Once the regulator wakes up, it drives the voltage back to a new operating Point B. The sluggish response of the regulator mimics the action of an inductor, which is why Figure 1 makes such an effective model.

When the load switches off, the response pops back high at Point C. (Inductors do that.) The overall peak-to-peak response of the red waveform equals nearly twice the amplitude of the initial glitch.

Now, increase R1 to 0.012Ω and reapply the load. The black waveform goes down and stays down, displaying more long-term droop because of its larger series resistance. When the load cuts off, the positive glitch that inductor L1 causes begins at a lower level. Beginning lower, this glitch does not reach as high as the glitch on the red waveform. As a result, you obtain the smallest peak-to-peak response with R1=0.012Ω.

If you use this method, offset the resting voltage of your regulator toward the high end of its range to best center the overall step-response waveform.

Some switching regulators let you lower the gain of the control loop, effectively increasing the regulation resistance, R1, without dissipating additional power. This cool trick does not work for linear regulators.

Whatever you do, beware of the tolerances associated with all components in this circuit. Do not design something so tricky and intricately balanced that small changes in component values throw the system out of whack.

All Publications by Dr. Howard Johnson except as noted.
Signal Integrity Training Classes taught exclusively by Dr. Howard Johnson - for full schedule, see www.sigcon.com
© 1993-2007 Signal Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. • site map