previous     Approaching the Edge   next


Implications

  • You need equipment that accurately measures your system

  • You must know what adjustments are possible


19
24 train wreck Wawanesa, Manitoba, Canada
 


I'm not suggesting that worst-case design is useless. Far from it. A worst-case budget is usually where projects start.
I'm just saying that worst-case budgets doesn't always work either because you didn't include all the necessary factors, or because you made wrong assumptions to fill in gaps in the available data.
To design efficient, high-performance designs that never fall off the cliff you must combine your system budget with a lot of measurements. The measurements tell you how the budget is working right now, and the budget tells you what would happen if things got a little worse tomorrow. Between the two approaches, you have all the information you need.
My two-stage approach requires two things:
(1) Adequate laboratory equipment, and adequate laboratory practices (like low-capacitance probes with really short ground wires).
(2) Good, basic knowledge about what parameters matter the most, and how they can be adjusted.
First let's deal with the measurement issue.

-------(figure caption)------------------

http://collections.ic.gc.ca/wawanesa/E/gallery/disasters/trainwreck2.html
1924 train wreck Wawanesa, Manitoba, Canada
Wawanesa: A Prairie Heritage
 

"The Train Wreck of 1924"In 1924 a great rail disaster occurred in Wawanesa. While a train was crossing, the bridge gave way and the train was plunged into the river. One man perished in the wreckage.

Signal Integrity Training Classes taught exclusively by Dr. Howard Johnson
for full schedule, see www.sigcon.com

© 1993-2007 Signal Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.