We have developed a number of ways of dealing with
limited bandwidth.
For example, circa 150 B.C. the system shown previously
has been improved, as shown above, in two ways. First, you will notice
the use of multiple torches. Next, if you look closely, you can see that
the slaves are wearing fire-proof protective headgear - a good thing
thing when you have a lot of torches and hair in a confined space.
(continued from previous page)
The Greek historian Polybius then goes on to describe
how Aeneas in 350 BC used PWM to communicate complex messages with a
binary signaling scheme. This is how Polybius described it, over 2,100
years ago:
"Aeneas, the author of the work on strategy, wishing to
find a remedy for the difficulty, advanced matters a little, but his
device still fell far short of our requirements, as can be seen from his
description of it. He says that those who are about to communication
urgent news to each other by fire signal should procure two earthenware
vessels of exactly the same width and depth, the depth being some three
cubits and the width one. Then they should have corks made a little
narrower than the mouths of the vessels [so that the cork slides through
the neck and drops easily into the vessel] and through the middle of
each cork should pass a rod graduated in equal section of three
finger-breadths, each clearly marked off from the next. In each section
should be written the most evident and ordinary events that occur in
war, e.g., on the first, "Cavalry arrived in the country," on the second
"Heavy infantry," on the third "Light-armed infantry," next "Infantry
and cavalry," next "Ships," next "Corn," and so on until we have entered
in all the sections the chief contingencies of which, at the present
time, there is a reasonable probability in wartime. Next, he tells us to
bore holes in both vessels of exactly the same size, so that they allow
exactly the same escape. Then we are to fill the vessels with water and
put on the corks with the rods in them and allow the water to flow
through the two apertures. When this is done it is evident that, the
conditions being precisely similar, in proportion as the water escapes
the two corks will sink and the rods will disappear into the vessels.
When by experiment it is seen that the rapidity of escape is in both
cases the same, the vessels are to be conveyed to the places in which
both parties are to look after the signals and deposited there. Now
whenever any of the contingencies written on the rods occurs he tells us
to raise a torch and to wait until the corresponding party raises
another. When both the torches are clearly visible the signaler is to
lower his torch and at once allow the water to escape through the
aperture. Whenever, as the corks sink, the contingency you wish to
communicate reaches the mouth of the vessel he tells the signaler to
raise his torch and the receivers of the signal are to stop the aperture
at once and to note which of the messages written on the rods is at the
mouth of the vessel. This will be the message delivered, if the
apparatus works at the same pace in both cases. "
Not many would have trouble reproducing the device from
this description. It appears that precisely this system was used for the
communications of the Roman troops at Carthage, on the Tunesian coast of
North Africa, and Sicily in the second century A.D., long after Polybius.