|
When Logic Switches Too Fast
(Originally published in
Electronic Design
Magazine, July, 1996)
"We've been
shipping the same product for 10 years now, and it worked
just fine until last month. I don't know what happened,
but that new batch of chips just doesn't seem to work
anymore. The darn thing just has a 5-MHz processor and a
few logic gates. What could have gone wrong?"Sound familiar? That's
not too surprising. I hear the same story from engineers
all over the country. The most common cause of this
problem is rise-time shrinkage.
Not long ago,
the major TTL logic families all had typical rise and
fall times that, by modern standards, were very slow--on
the order of 10 ns. Products that use these old chips
have few problems with ringing or crosstalk. Today's
digital logic operates much faster. Modern vanilla-bean
logic families have rise and fall times on the order of 1
ns or less. As chips continue to shrink, and as switching
speeds continue to improve by a factor of two every few
years, we will soon see rise and fall times slink down
into the deep sub-nanosecond realm, a territory
previously reserved for UHF and microwave engineers. This
relentless, shrinking trend toward sub-nanosecond
risetimes brings us to the crux of the problem: Faster
switching exaggerates problems with ringing and
crosstalk. Over the years, as logic outputs have
continued to switch faster and faster, problems with
ringing and crosstalk have gotten progressively worse.
The two traces
in the figure illustrate the nature of the problem. This
scenario represents the behavior of an unterminated logic
trace which is driven with two different test signals:
(a) Typical 1986
driver output (rise/fall = 5 ns)
(b) Typical 1996 driver output (rise/fall = 1/2 ns)

In both cases,
the trace is the same length (3 in.) and is driven with
the same logic pattern. With the older, slower driver,
the signal looks OK. With the newer, faster driver, the
signal is almost unrecognizable. There aren't too many of
us that would want to depend on such a signal for our
processor clock or address-data bus, yet this is
precisely the signal found in many digital products
(hopefully, not yours). These products were often
designed in one era, assuming slow logic, and
subsequently assembled using more modern, faster logic.
The clock rate in both cases is the same. Nobody sped
up the clock. The problem is entirely due to an
increase in switching speed (faster rise and fall times).
Where ringing is concerned, the switching speed matters
more than the clock rate.
This example
brings home two very important points. First, for a given
layout, faster switching makes for uglier signals. This
problem is inescapable. It can only be circumvented by
improving the layout, reducing the loads, or adding
terminators. Second, chip manufacturers are not always
doing us a favor when they begin shipping ``new and
improved'' logic circuits. When substituted into an older
design, the increase in speed may buy you nothing but
headaches.
[Pubs/_copyrightINCLUDEfooter1996.htm]
|